Botanical disruption of host-pathogen interactions and biofilm gene expression in uropathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

10.22111/jep.2026.55683.1110

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of biofilm-forming Klebsiella pneumoniae in urinary tract infections (UTIs) necessitates the exploration of alternative plant-based therapeutics. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the anti-biofilm and virulence-attenuating properties of aqueous extracts from Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum (ice plant) and Maclura pomifera (Osage orange) against clinical K. pneumoniae isolates. Clinically confirmed K. pneumoniae isolates were screened for biofilm formation capacity. Following the preparation of both plant extracts, their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined. Furthermore, the sub-inhibitory impacts of these extracts on biofilm formation, bacterial adhesion, and invasion in the human epithelial cell model (HK-2) were evaluated. The transcriptional modulation of key virulence genes (fimH, mrkA, rmpA, wzi, luxS) was assessed using qRT-PCR. Cytotoxicity was evaluated via the MTT assay. Among the isolates, 80.9% exhibited biofilm-producing capabilities. The M. nodiflorum extract demonstrated a superior inhibitory profile (MIC = 256 µg/mL) compared to M. pomifera (MIC = 512 µg/mL). At sub-MIC levels, M. nodiflorum significantly reduced biofilm biomass by 41.7%, whereas M. pomifera achieved only a 22.5% reduction. Similarly, host cell adhesion and intracellular invasion were suppressed by approximately 45% using M. nodiflorum, compared to a marginal 20–24% reduction by M. pomifera. Transcriptional profiling confirmed that M. nodiflorum strongly downregulated fimH, mrkA, rmpA, wzi, and luxS expression, while the regulatory impact of M. pomifera was notably weaker. Both extracts maintained high host cell viability (>89%) at therapeutic doses. The M. nodiflorum aqueous extract exhibits significantly higher translational potential than M. pomifera as an anti-virulence agent. By effectively disrupting the biofilm genetic architecture and limiting host-pathogen interactions, M. nodiflorum offers a promising scaffold for managing K. pneumoniae-associated UTIs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abhinand, K., Menon, A. M., Thomas, S. S., et al. (2025). Klebsiella pneumoniae: Host interactions, virulence mechanisms, and novel therapeutic strategies. Microbial Pathogenesis, 207, 107856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107856
Ampofo, E. K., Amponsah, I. K., Asante-Kwatia, E., Armah, F. A., Atchoglo, P. K., & Mensah, A. Y. (2020). Indigenous medicinal plants as biofilm inhibitors for the mitigation of antimicrobial resistance. Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 8821905. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8821905
Arena, R., Manuguerra, S., Collins, E., Mahdhi, A., Renda, G., Messina, C. M., & Santulli, A. (2020). Antioxidant properties of a supercritical fluid extract of the halophyte Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum L. from Sicilian coasts: Nutraceutical and cosmeceutical applications. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072374
Chen, L., Wilksch, J. J., Liu, H., Zhang, X., Torres, V. V. L., Bi, W., Mandela, E., Cao, J., Li, J., Lithgow, T., & Zhou, T. (2020). Investigation of LuxS-mediated quorum sensing in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 69(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001148
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2021). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (28th ed., CLSI supplement M100). Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Ding, J., Yan, W., Zheng, R., Ma, M., & Jiang, L. (2025). Combating Klebsiella pneumoniae: From antimicrobial resistance mechanisms to phage-based combination therapies. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 15, 1691215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1691215
Dong, N., Li, R., & Lai, Y. (2022). Editorial: Klebsiella pneumoniae: Antimicrobial resistance, virulence and therapeutic strategies. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 12, 1108817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1108817
Ghasemi, M., Liang, S., Luu, Q. M., & Kempson, I. (2023). The MTT assay: A method for error minimization and interpretation in measuring cytotoxicity and estimating cell viability. In O. Friedrich & D. F. Gilbert (Eds.), Cell Viability Assays. Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol. 2644). New York, NY: Humana. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3052-5_2
Gordon, J. L., Brown, M. A., & Reynolds, M. M. (2018). Cell-based methods for determination of efficacy for candidate therapeutics in the clinical management of cancer. Diseases, 6(4), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases6040085
Hamidi Hesari, M., Hashemi, T., Hemmat, J., & Sadeghi Fard, N. (2023). Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility of Klebsiella species causing urinary tract infection in Iran and other countries around Asia. Microbiology, Metabolites and Biotechnology, 6(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.22104/mmb.2024.6840.1139
Hampton, T. H., Taub, L., Ferreria-Fukutani, K., Stanton, B. A., & MacKenzie, T. A. (2025). Analyzing qPCR data: Better practices to facilitate rigor and reproducibility. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 44, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102356
Haney, E. F., Trimble, M. J., Cheng, J. T., Vallé, Q., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2018). Critical assessment of methods to quantify biofilm growth and evaluate antibiofilm activity of host defence peptides. Biomolecules, 8(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom8020029
Harshitha, R., & Arunraj, D. R. (2021). Real-time quantitative PCR: A tool for absolute and relative quantification. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49, 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21552
Herbert, D. B., Gross, T., Rupp, O., & Becker, A. (2021). Transcriptome analysis reveals major transcriptional changes during regrowth after mowing of red clover (Trifolium pratense). BMC Plant Biology, 21(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02867-0
Hosseini-nejad, A., & Alimadadi, N. (2025). Antibacterial, anti-biofilm, and antioxidant activities of some Iranian honeys with different floral origins. Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 19(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.30699/ijmm.19.1.74
Joseph, B. J., Mathew, M., Rachel, R., Mathew, J., & Radhakrishnan, E. K. (2024). Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence factors and biofilm components: Synthesis, structure, function, and inhibitors. In S. Busi & R. Prasad (Eds.), ESKAPE Pathogens. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8799-3_9
Li, Y., & Ni, M. (2023). Regulation of biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1238482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238482
Mim, T. J., Ahmad, I., Hrach, V. L., et al. (2026). Klebsiella pneumoniae and urinary tract infections: Pathogenesis, resistance, and advances in management. European Journal of Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04589-1
Moses, V., Kandi, V., Bharadwaj, V., et al. (2024). Molecular characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates through whole-genome sequencing: A comprehensive analysis of serotypes, sequence types, and antimicrobial and virulence genes. Cureus, 16(4), e58449. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58449
Pinto, D., Vieira, R., Teixeira, F., Sut, S., Vieira, M., Salazar, M., Delerue-Matos, C., Dall’Acqua, S., & Rodrigues, F. (2025). Unlocking the functional potential of Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum: Insights into digestibility, safety and intestinal uptake. Applied Food Research, 5(2), 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101315
Qasemi, A. (2024). Comparative effects of Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum extract and biosynthesized silver nanoparticles on the expression of biofilm-related genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urinary tract infections in Zahedan (2022–2023). Journal of Epigenetics, 5(2), 53–60.
https://doi.org/10.22111/JEP.2025.50974.1079
Rana, D. S., Sharma, V., & Sheershwal, A. (2025). Understanding host-pathogen interactions in urinary tract infections and advancements in diagnostic methods. Urological Science, 36(2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.4103/UROS.UROS_98_24
Sahu, A., Jain, S., Junghare, M., Mishra, A., & Ruhal, R. (2025). Biofilm-dispersal patterns in ESKAPE pathogens. Archives of Microbiology, 207(9), 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-025-04394-0
Sainz-Hernández, J. C., Rueda-Puente, E. O., Cornejo-Ramírez, Y. I., Bernal-Mercado, A. T., González-Ocampo, H. A., & López-Corona, B. E. (2023). Biological application of the allopathic characteristics of the genus Maclura: A review. Plants, 12(19), 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193480
Seifi, K., Kazemian, H., Heidari, H., Rezagholizadeh, F., Saee, Y., Shirvani, F., & Houri, H. (2016). Evaluation of biofilm formation among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates and molecular characterization by ERIC-PCR. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, 9(1), e30682. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.30682
Stepanović, S., Vuković, D., Hola, V., Di Bonaventura, G., Djukić, S., Cirković, I., et al. (2007). Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: Overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS, 115(8), 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x
Thibeaux, R., Kainiu, M., & Goarant, C. (2020). Biofilm formation and quantification using the 96-microtiter plate. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2134, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0467-0_14
Timm, M. R., Russell, S. K., & Hultgren, S. J. (2025). Urinary tract infections: Pathogenesis, host susceptibility and emerging therapeutics. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 23, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01092-4
Zipperer, A., & Kretschmer, D. (2017). Cytotoxicity assays as predictors of the safety and efficacy of antimicrobial agents. In P. Sass (Ed.), Antibiotics. Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol. 1520). New York, NY: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_6
Journal of Epigenetics
Volume 7, Issue 1
April 2026
Pages 64-71

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 June 2026
  • Revise Date: 17 June 2026
  • Accept Date: 07 July 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics